Manufacturing - Compass HSC https://compasshsc.co.uk Health and Safety Consulting Thu, 11 Sep 2025 18:33:06 +0000 en-GB hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.2 https://compasshsc.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/cropped-Social-logo-32x32.png Manufacturing - Compass HSC https://compasshsc.co.uk 32 32 Chemical Company Fined £100,000 After Worker Suffers Steam Burns https://compasshsc.co.uk/chemical-company-fined-after-worker-suffers-steam-burns/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=chemical-company-fined-after-worker-suffers-steam-burns Tue, 09 Sep 2025 08:00:00 +0000 https://compasshsc.co.uk/?p=14247 Chemical company fined £100,000 after 23-year-old worker suffered permanent scarring from steam burns caused by unsafe cleaning equipment with no operator controls.

The post Chemical Company Fined £100,000 After Worker Suffers Steam Burns first appeared on Compass HSC.

]]>
In Court: Chemical Company Fined £100,000 After Worker Suffers Steam Burns
 
Industrial steam cleaning equipment with safety controls and warning signage in chemical processing facility

Modern steam cleaning equipment showing proper safety controls and emergency shut-off mechanisms

 
IN COURT

Chemical Company Fined £100,000 After Worker Suffers Steam Burns

A chemical company has been fined £100,000 after a 23-year-old worker suffered permanent scarring from burns caused by an unsafe steam cleaning system.

Case summary

  • Court date: 18 August 2025
  • Court: Hamilton Sheriff Court
  • Fine: £100,000
  • Breach: Section 2(1) HSWA 1974

The incident

On 23 October 2019, a 23-year-old worker at Dundas Chemical Company (Mosspark) Limited suffered serious burns while cleaning a process water tank at the company's Omoa Works site in Newarthill, Motherwell. The worker, who had been employed at the rendering plant for around two years, was permanently scarred across his back and other areas of his body.

During a night shift, the worker was instructed to clean the process water tank, vickery, and surrounding areas using pressure washers and a steam hose for difficult areas with tallow and animal residues. The steam hose was heavy and cumbersome, with an uninsulated nozzle that became hot during use.

While working alone using a cherry picker, the worker attached the steam hose to the basket. After raising to the required height, the steam hose and nozzle spun round, directing steam flow directly at him in the confined basket space. He quickly turned his back to protect his face but sustained severe burns before managing to lower the basket and reach the emergency deluge shower.

The company pleaded guilty to breaching section 2(1) of the Health and Safety at Work etc Act 1974 and was fined £100,000 at Hamilton Sheriff Court on 18 August 2025.

HSE investigation findings

The Health and Safety Executive investigation revealed multiple serious failures in the company's steam cleaning systems and procedures.

  • Unsafe equipment design. The steam hose nozzle lacked a trigger or mechanism to allow operators to start or stop steam flow at the point of operation.
  • Poor maintenance. The mixing valve and setup for supplying hot water was not maintained in efficient working order or good repair.
  • Known defects ignored. Supervisors were aware the mixing valve was passing steam but took no action to investigate or prevent the problem.
  • Lack of engineering competence. The maintenance and engineering team had no sound understanding of risks involved in setting up washdown systems or how to control those risks.

Legal requirements for equipment safety

Under the Health and Safety at Work etc Act 1974, employers have fundamental duties to ensure the safety of their employees. This includes providing safe equipment and maintaining it in good working order.

Equipment duties

  • Provide safe equipment and systems of work
  • Maintain equipment in safe condition
  • Ensure proper training on equipment use
  • Conduct regular inspections and maintenance

PUWER requirements

  • Equipment suitable for intended use
  • Proper maintenance and inspection
  • Adequate safety controls and guards
  • Clear operating instructions and training

Where the safety system failed

This case demonstrates how multiple safety failures can combine to create serious injury risks. The company's approach to equipment design, maintenance and risk management fell short of legal requirements at every level.

The fundamental issue was treating equipment safety as a technical problem rather than a systematic risk management challenge requiring competent engineering input and proper maintenance procedures.

Practical steps for chemical processing

  • Equipment design. Ensure all cleaning equipment has proper operator controls, including emergency stop mechanisms at the point of use.
  • Maintenance systems. Implement planned maintenance with competent engineers who understand process risks and control requirements.
  • Risk assessment. Conduct thorough assessments of cleaning procedures, especially when using hot water, steam or chemicals in confined spaces.
  • Supervision standards. Train supervisors to identify and act on equipment defects rather than allowing continued use of faulty systems.
  • Emergency procedures. Ensure emergency showers and first aid facilities are easily accessible from all work areas.

Common equipment failures

  • Lack of operator controls on hazardous equipment
  • Poor maintenance allowing known defects to persist
  • Inadequate risk assessment of cleaning procedures
  • Insufficient engineering competence in equipment design
  • Failure to provide adequate emergency facilities

Steam and hot water systems require particular attention due to the severity of potential burn injuries and the speed at which incidents can occur.

Need help with equipment safety assessments

Compass HSC provides equipment risk assessments, maintenance planning and safety training to protect your workers and ensure compliance.

Talk to Compass HSC or call (01253) 735755

Lessons for manufacturing businesses

This case highlights the importance of systematic approaches to equipment safety in chemical processing and manufacturing environments. The consequences of poor equipment design and maintenance can be severe and permanent.

Design phase

Include safety controls and operator interfaces from initial equipment specification stage.

Installation phase

Ensure competent engineering oversight and proper commissioning procedures.

Operational phase

Implement planned maintenance and immediate response to identified defects.

Protecting workers from equipment hazards

This case demonstrates the serious consequences of inadequate equipment safety management. When cleaning systems, maintenance procedures and risk assessment all fail simultaneously, workers face unnecessary and preventable risks. For chemical processing businesses, systematic attention to equipment design, maintenance and operator training is essential to prevent similar incidents.

Contact Compass HSC

Or call (01253) 735755

About Brian Lambert

Brian Lambert at his desk

Brian Lambert (CMIOSH-IMaPS), the founder of Compass Health & Safety Consultancy (HSC), is a Chartered Member of IOSH and an accomplished IMaPS professional. With decades of industry experience, Brian is dedicated to guiding businesses of all sizes through the complexities of health and safety management.

His approach is built on integrity, innovation, and an unwavering commitment to raising the standard in health and safety. As a trusted advisor, Brian's insights help organisations enhance compliance, reduce risk, and boost operational efficiency.

Connect with Brian on LinkedIn

Connect with Compass HSC

← Back to Compass Spotlight

The post Chemical Company Fined £100,000 After Worker Suffers Steam Burns first appeared on Compass HSC.

]]>
COSHH: Control of Substances Hazardous to Health in 2025 https://compasshsc.co.uk/coshh-regulations-2025/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=coshh-regulations-2025 https://compasshsc.co.uk/coshh-regulations-2025/#respond Wed, 03 Sep 2025 08:00:00 +0000 https://compasshsc.co.uk/?p=14169 Practical COSHH guidance for 2025. Understand the risks, your legal duties, and the controls that work in real workplaces, from LEV and exposure monitoring to health surveillance.

The post COSHH: Control of Substances Hazardous to Health in 2025 first appeared on Compass HSC.

]]>
COSHH: Control of Substances Hazardous to Health in 2025

COSHH: Protecting workers from hazardous substances

COSHH underpins daily decisions in workshops, kitchens and sites. This is how to keep exposure low, meet legal duties and keep work moving.

From cleaning products to construction dust, hazardous substances appear in routine tasks. Problems grow quietly when controls slip, so COSHH asks a simple question, where does exposure come from and how will you prevent or control it

Why COSHH matters now

Ill health from substances is still common. Respiratory disease, dermatitis and long term lung damage follow when dusts, fumes, mists or vapours are not controlled. Beyond the human cost there are business effects, stoppages, claims and lost quality. Get the basics right and work is cleaner, steadier and more reliable.

What the law expects

Employers must assess the risk, prevent exposure where practicable and control what remains to an acceptable level. Keep controls in good order, monitor exposure where needed, provide health surveillance where there is a reasonable likelihood of disease, inform and train workers, and plan for spills and emergencies. Local exhaust ventilation needs thorough examination and test at suitable intervals, commonly every 14 months.

Controls that work on real jobs

Start with the task. Spot where dust or fume is created and remove the cause if you can. If not, capture at source with well positioned hoods or on tool extraction. Limit time on task, separate dusty work and keep housekeeping tight so settled dust is not lifted again. Use RPE only as the last line of defence, face fit testing and the correct filters matter.

  • Inventory: keep a live list of products and processes that can create exposure, with current safety data sheets.
  • Maintenance: check LEV, filters, gauges and alarms work as intended, record what you do.
  • Monitoring: use air sampling or other checks where needed to show controls are effective and limits are not exceeded.
  • Health surveillance: set up skin checks for irritants and lung function checks for sensitisers where appropriate.
  • Briefings: short, job specific guidance keeps the method in use and stops drift.

Fast facts: LEV thorough examination and test is commonly every 14 months. RPE must be fit tested for the wearer and matched to the contaminant. Monitoring and health checks provide evidence that controls are working over time.

Where plans usually slip

The pattern is familiar, inventories lapse, assessments are not updated when products or processes change, LEV hoods are poorly positioned or never tested, disposable masks are used without fit testing, health surveillance tails off. A short reset brings the system back to life.

How Compass HSC helps

We map substances and tasks, write clear COSHH assessments and design practical controls. We plan LEV examinations and tests, set up monitoring and health surveillance and provide concise training and site briefings.

For steady assurance we offer retained support that keeps reviews, checks and records on track through the year.

Need to review your COSHH system

Talk to our team about a practical reset that fits your operation.

Talk to Compass HSC

Or visit www.compasshsc.co.uk/contact

Conclusion

Strong COSHH control protects people and improves reliability. If assessments are old or LEV performance is uncertain, take a week to refresh the inventory, confirm controls and restart health checks. Small steps prevent bigger problems.

About Brian Lambert

Brian Lambert at his desk

Brian Lambert (CMIOSH-IMaPS) founded Compass Health and Safety Consultancy in 2002. He helps organisations put proportionate controls in place, meet legal duties and keep work running well.

For COSHH, Brian focuses on live substance inventories, practical LEV examination schedules and clear advice on RPE fit testing. Teams value straight answers and short site briefings that make the system easy to run.

Connect with Brian on LinkedIn

Connect with Compass HSC

← Back to Compass Spotlight

The post COSHH: Control of Substances Hazardous to Health in 2025 first appeared on Compass HSC.

]]>
https://compasshsc.co.uk/coshh-regulations-2025/feed/ 0
In Court: Car Dealership Fined £204,000 After Workers Diagnosed with Hand Arm Vibration Syndrome https://compasshsc.co.uk/havs-vibration-risk-fine-rowes-garage/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=havs-vibration-risk-fine-rowes-garage https://compasshsc.co.uk/havs-vibration-risk-fine-rowes-garage/#respond Fri, 06 Jun 2025 13:00:00 +0000 https://compasshsc.co.uk/?p=14111 A car dealership has been fined £204,000 after two employees were diagnosed with Hand Arm Vibration Syndrome (HAVS). Learn what employers must do to manage vibration risks.

The post In Court: Car Dealership Fined £204,000 After Workers Diagnosed with Hand Arm Vibration Syndrome first appeared on Compass HSC.

]]>

Hand Arm Vibration Syndrome (HAVS) remains one of the most preventable occupational health risks — yet too many employers are still failing to manage it properly.
This latest prosecution highlights the serious consequences of neglecting to assess and control vibration risks in the workplace.

The case: Rowes Garage Ltd
Devon and Cornwall-based Rowes Garage Ltd has been fined £204,000 after two employees were diagnosed with Hand Arm Vibration Syndrome (HAVS) following repeated exposure to vibration from tools used at its Truro body shop.

The workers were regularly using random-orbital sanders and reciprocating saws to carry out car body repairs. One of them reported experiencing symptoms of HAVS for around eight years.

What is HAVS?
Prolonged and regular exposure to vibration can cause painful and disabling disorders affecting the

  • Nerves

  • Blood supply

  • Joints

  • Muscles of the hands and arms

These conditions are collectively known as HAVS. The risk of onset or worsening increases with daily exposure and varies between individuals.

HSE findings
An HSE investigation found that Rowes Garage Ltd had failed to implement the basic elements of vibration risk management:

  • No suitable and sufficient risk assessment

  • No effective control measures

  • No programme of monitoring employee exposure

  • No information, instruction, or training for employees

  • No action taken even after years of reported symptoms by the affected employees

The outcome
Rowes Garage Ltd (now registered at Vertu House, Gateshead) pleaded guilty to breaching Section 2(1) of The Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974.

The company was fined £204,000 and ordered to pay £8,099 in costs at Plymouth Magistrates’ Court on 8 May 2025.

What this means for employers
HAVS is a preventable condition — but only if employers take their legal responsibilities seriously

  • Carry out a vibration risk assessment

  • Implement control measures to minimise exposure

  • Monitor exposure levels

  • Provide suitable training and information

  • Conduct health surveillance and act promptly on any signs or symptoms

Are Your Vibration Controls Compliant?

Compass HSC can help you implement a full vibration risk management programme — from risk assessments and control measures to monitoring and health surveillance. Don’t risk costly fines or employee ill health.

The post In Court: Car Dealership Fined £204,000 After Workers Diagnosed with Hand Arm Vibration Syndrome first appeared on Compass HSC.

]]>
https://compasshsc.co.uk/havs-vibration-risk-fine-rowes-garage/feed/ 0
In Court: Wood Supplier Fined £40,000 for Failing to Protect Workers from Wood Dust Exposure https://compasshsc.co.uk/wood-dust-control-fine-nat-pal-case/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=wood-dust-control-fine-nat-pal-case https://compasshsc.co.uk/wood-dust-control-fine-nat-pal-case/#respond Fri, 06 Jun 2025 12:00:00 +0000 https://compasshsc.co.uk/?p=14106 A wood supplier has been fined £40,000 after failing to protect employees from wood dust exposure — a key focus of HSE enforcement. Learn what the law requires.

The post In Court: Wood Supplier Fined £40,000 for Failing to Protect Workers from Wood Dust Exposure first appeared on Compass HSC.

]]>

Exposure to wood dust remains a major occupational health risk — one that is well understood, and fully controllable when the right measures are in place.

Yet despite clear guidance and ongoing HSE campaigns, employers continue to neglect basic protections — with serious legal and financial consequences.

The case: Nat Pal Limited
Fakenham-based Nat Pal Limited has been fined £40,000 after a Health and Safety Executive (HSE) inspection in April 2023 uncovered serious failings in its controls for managing wood dust exposure.

HSE inspectors found dust scattered across the floor throughout the site, highlighting both poor control measures and a lack of effective housekeeping.

The inspection led to enforcement action — and the company was ultimately prosecuted under Section 2(1) of the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974 for failing to ensure, so far as reasonably practicable, the health, safety and welfare at work of its employees.

Why wood dust matters
Breathing in wood dust excessively can cause:

  • Asthma

  • Nasal cancer

Both are well-documented occupational diseases — which is why HSE continues to target this issue through proactive inspections across the woodworking industry.

What the law requires
HSE guidance clearly states that employers must take effective measures to prevent employee exposure to wood dust. This normally includes:

  • Providing and maintaining local exhaust ventilation (LEV) systems

  • Ensuring face-fit tested respiratory protective equipment (RPE) is used where needed

  • Carrying out health surveillance to monitor employees’ respiratory health

The outcome
Nat Pal Limited, of Cummings Road, Tattersett Business Park, Fakenham, pleaded guilty to breaching Section 2(1) of the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974.

The company was fined £40,000 and ordered to pay costs of £4,072 at Norwich Magistrates’ Court on 16 May 2025.

The lesson
The woodworking sector remains a key focus for HSE enforcement — and this case highlights how quickly companies can find themselves in court when basic precautions are neglected.

With proactive inspection campaigns ongoing, it’s essential that all businesses handling wood dust review their controls now — before enforcement action is taken.

Is Your Wood Dust Control Up to Standard?

Don’t risk enforcement action or employee health — Compass HSC can audit your existing wood dust controls, advise on best practices, and help you achieve compliance with current HSE expectations.

The post In Court: Wood Supplier Fined £40,000 for Failing to Protect Workers from Wood Dust Exposure first appeared on Compass HSC.

]]>
https://compasshsc.co.uk/wood-dust-control-fine-nat-pal-case/feed/ 0
Legal Liabilities of Line Managers and Supervisors: A Closer Look https://compasshsc.co.uk/legal-liabilities-of-line-managers-and-supervisors-a-closer-look/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=legal-liabilities-of-line-managers-and-supervisors-a-closer-look https://compasshsc.co.uk/legal-liabilities-of-line-managers-and-supervisors-a-closer-look/#respond Thu, 08 May 2025 08:00:00 +0000 https://compasshsc.co.uk/?p=13921

Health and safety responsibilities don’t stop at the boardroom. While the Managing Director or Chief Executive holds the ultimate accountability, the day-to-day responsibility for ensuring a safe working environment often falls squarely on the shoulders of line managers and supervisors.

This isn’t just good practice—it’s the law. Under the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974, individuals in supervisory positions can be held personally liable for health and safety breaches—particularly under Section 36. This section outlines that if one person instructs another to carry out a task that leads to injury or ill health, the person giving the instruction may be guilty of an offence. This becomes especially significant in environments where permit-to-work systems are used. If a line manager or supervisor issues an inaccurate or unsafe permit, and a contractor or employee is subsequently injured as a result, the person who issued the permit can be held personally responsible. This isn’t just theory—it has led to real prosecutions. Likewise, any employee found guilty of criminal neglect—such as encouraging unsafe practices or failing to intervene in unsafe conditions—can face personal consequences if their actions lead to harm. While fines for individual employees may not reach the same magnitude as those levied against corporate bodies, they are still serious. The courts have the power to recover fines through several mechanisms:
  • Deduction from wages
  • Seizure of personal property, including homes or vehicles
  • Charging orders placed against assets
  • In more severe or unresolved cases, imprisonment
The takeaway is clear: health and safety is not just a corporate concern. It is a personal responsibility at every level of management. Supervisors and line managers are expected to lead by example, model safe behaviour, and ensure the proper procedures are followed. To do that, they must be trained, supported, and aware of their legal duties. A failure to act isn’t just a lapse in judgement—it can be a criminal offence. Need help ensuring your line managers and supervisors understand their legal obligations? Compass HSC offers tailored training, compliance audits, and practical guidance to help reinforce accountability across your workforce. Contact us today to find out how we can support you in building a safer and legally compliant workplace.

The post Legal Liabilities of Line Managers and Supervisors: A Closer Look first appeared on Compass HSC.

]]>
https://compasshsc.co.uk/legal-liabilities-of-line-managers-and-supervisors-a-closer-look/feed/ 0
Wood Manufacturer Fined Over £1 Million After Two Workers Injured https://compasshsc.co.uk/wood-manufacturer-fined-over-1-million-after-two-workers-injured/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=wood-manufacturer-fined-over-1-million-after-two-workers-injured https://compasshsc.co.uk/wood-manufacturer-fined-over-1-million-after-two-workers-injured/#respond Wed, 19 Mar 2025 09:00:00 +0000 https://compasshsc.co.uk/?p=13762

Wood Manufacturer Fined Over £1 Million After Two Workers Injured

A multinational wood-based product manufacturer, West Fraser (Europe) Ltd, has been fined more than £1 million following two serious workplace incidents at its Cowie plant in 2020. The company, formerly known as Norbord, pleaded guilty to multiple health and safety breaches related to both incidents, which occurred within six months of each other.

First Incident: Worker Entangled in Machinery

In January 2020, Sean Gallagher, a 29-year-old utility operator, suffered severe injuries after his leg became trapped in the moving parts of a storage bunker at the plant’s biomass facility.

Gallagher initially followed company procedures when he entered the bunker to inspect a fault. However, later in his shift, he returned to the bunker without isolating the power. His leg became entangled in the machinery, and he had to use his phone to call for help.

He was eventually freed and taken to the hospital, where he was diagnosed with compound fractures to his tibia and fibula.

Following the incident, the company implemented a new safety measure by installing a mesh guard across the bunker hatch. This guard is now padlocked and can only be unlocked by a supervisor after the system has been properly isolated.

Second Incident: Scaffolder Falls Over 13 Feet

Just six months later, in July 2020, scaffolder David McMillan, 39, fell more than 13 feet from a rooftop gantry after a rusted plate gave way beneath him. McMillan suffered multiple fractures, including to his neck and ankle, and spent 20 days in the hospital.

A Health and Safety Executive (HSE) investigation revealed that the company had no maintenance schedule or system of checks for the gantry structure. Inspectors found that the steel flooring was corroded, and some welds holding the plates in place were near failure. Following the incident, the gantry was immediately placed out of bounds before being dismantled and permanently removed.

Company Fined for Health and Safety Breaches

As a result of these incidents, West Fraser (Europe) Ltd faced significant legal consequences:

  • For the first incident, the company admitted to breaching Regulations 11(1) and (2) of the Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations 1998 and Section 33(1)(c) of the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974. The company was fined £28,000 at Stirling Sheriff Court on 17 February 2025.
  • For the second incident, the company pleaded guilty to breaching Sections 4(2) and 33(1)(a) of the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974. They received a much steeper fine of £1,040,000 at the same court hearing.

Repeated Safety Failures

This is not the first time the company has faced scrutiny over workplace safety. In 2022, West Fraser (Europe) Ltd was fined over £2 million after an employee suffered fatal burns at the same facility.

Lessons for Employers

These incidents highlight the severe consequences of failing to implement and maintain proper health and safety measures. Regular inspections, effective training, and robust maintenance schedules are essential in preventing workplace injuries and fatalities.

At Compass HSC, we provide expert guidance to ensure your business meets health and safety compliance standards, reducing risk and protecting workers. Contact us today for professional support in workplace safety management.

The post Wood Manufacturer Fined Over £1 Million After Two Workers Injured first appeared on Compass HSC.

]]>
https://compasshsc.co.uk/wood-manufacturer-fined-over-1-million-after-two-workers-injured/feed/ 0
Company Fined After Worker Loses Three Fingers in Panel Saw Incident https://compasshsc.co.uk/company-fined-after-worker-loses-three-fingers-in-panel-saw-incident/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=company-fined-after-worker-loses-three-fingers-in-panel-saw-incident https://compasshsc.co.uk/company-fined-after-worker-loses-three-fingers-in-panel-saw-incident/#respond Tue, 18 Mar 2025 09:00:00 +0000 https://compasshsc.co.uk/?p=13757

Company Fined After Worker Loses Three Fingers in Panel Saw Incident

A Preventable Workplace Tragedy

A construction industry supplier has been fined after an employee suffered a life-changing injury while operating a panel saw. The incident occurred atPemberton Timber Frame Limited in Ramsgate, resulting in severe hand injuries for 36-year-old David Broadway.

The Incident

On4 January 2023, Mr. Broadway was instructed to reduce the thickness of a length of timber using apanel saw. The task required multiple passes of the timber through the saw, as the depth of the blade was insufficient to cut through in a single pass. CCTV footage captured the moment he attempted to complete the second cut when his right hand came into contact with the moving saw blade. The result was theinstant amputation of three fingers—his index, middle, and ring fingers—as well as additional injuries to his little finger.

Investigation Findings

A subsequentHealth and Safety Executive (HSE) investigation revealed serious failings in safety measures at Pemberton Timber Frame Ltd. Key findings included:

  • Thepanel saw was not suitable for the task assigned.

  • Theemployee had not received adequate training or instruction on the safe operation of the machine.

  • Essentialsafety features were absent, including ariving knife, which helps prevent material from pinching the blade and reducing kickback.

  • A push stick was not used, increasing the risk of direct hand contact with the saw.

Legal Consequences

On8 January 2025,Pemberton Timber Frame Ltd pleaded guilty to breachingSection 2(1) of the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974 atSevenoaks Magistrates’ Court. The company was fined£12,000 and ordered to pay full costs of£4,034.

Key Lessons for Employers

This case underscores thecritical importance of proper machine safety measures and staff training in the workplace. Employers must:

✅ Ensureworkers are trained in the correct and safe operation of all machinery. ✅ Provideadequate safety features, such as riving knives and guarding systems. ✅ Enforce the use ofpush sticks and other safety tools to prevent direct contact with blades. ✅ Regularlyinspect and maintain machinery to ensure all protective devices are in place and functional.

Protecting Your Workforce

Incidents like this highlight why workplacerisk assessments and safety training are essential.Compass HSC can help businesses implement effectivemachinery safety policies and compliance strategies to protect employees and avoid costly legal consequences.

📢Concerned about machine safety in your workplace? ContactCompass HSC for expert guidance on risk management and compliance.

The post Company Fined After Worker Loses Three Fingers in Panel Saw Incident first appeared on Compass HSC.

]]>
https://compasshsc.co.uk/company-fined-after-worker-loses-three-fingers-in-panel-saw-incident/feed/ 0
Understanding UK Health and Safety Regulations and Acts https://compasshsc.co.uk/understanding-uk-health-and-safety-regulations-and-acts/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=understanding-uk-health-and-safety-regulations-and-acts https://compasshsc.co.uk/understanding-uk-health-and-safety-regulations-and-acts/#respond Mon, 17 Mar 2025 10:00:00 +0000 https://compasshsc.co.uk/?p=13746

Many businesses view health and safety laws as restrictive and complex, much like national speed limits—something people ignore until consequences arise. However, compliance is crucial, not just to avoid legal penalties but to protect workers and ensure business continuity.

The Role of Health and Safety Law

Health and safety legislation exists to prevent workplace injuries, illnesses, and fatalities. It provides a structured framework to help businesses manage risks effectively. Understanding and applying these laws can enhance productivity, reduce liabilities, and create a safer working environment.

The Foundation: Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974

At the core of UK health and safety law is theHealth and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974 (HSWA). This legislation sets out employers’ and employees’ responsibilities for workplace safety. From this Act, several regulations have been developed to address specific risks and industries.

Key Regulations Under HSWA

The following regulations stem from the HSWA and apply across various workplace environments:

  • Control of Substances Hazardous to Health (COSHH) Regulations – Governs the use and handling of hazardous substances.
  • Workplace (Health, Safety and Welfare) Regulations (WHSW) – Covers workplace conditions, cleanliness, and facilities.
  • Display Screen Equipment (DSE) Regulations – Addresses risks associated with screen use.
  • Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) Regulations – Ensures workers have appropriate protective gear.
  • First Aid Regulations – Specifies employer responsibilities for providing first aid in the workplace.
  • Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations (PUWER) – Ensures work equipment is suitable, maintained, and inspected regularly.
  • Control of Asbestos Regulations – Governs the management and removal of asbestos.
  • Noise at Work Regulations – Limits worker exposure to harmful noise levels.
  • Control of Vibration at Work Regulations – Addresses risks associated with hand-arm and whole-body vibration.
  • Construction (Design and Management) Regulations (CDM) – Ensures health and safety management in construction projects.
  • Lifting Operations and Lifting Equipment Regulations (LOLER) – Governs the use of lifting equipment.
  • Ionising Radiations Regulations – Controls exposure to ionising radiation in workplaces.
  • Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order (RRO) – Outlines fire safety duties for businesses.
  • Manual Handling Operations Regulations – Sets out requirements to reduce manual handling risks.
  • Electricity at Work Regulations – Ensures electrical safety in workplaces.
  • Confined Spaces Regulations – Governs work in confined or enclosed environments.
  • Reporting of Injuries, Diseases and Dangerous Occurrences Regulations (RIDDOR) – Mandates reporting of workplace incidents.
  • Dangerous Substances and Explosive Atmospheres Regulations (DSEAR) – Governs the use of flammable substances.
  • Control of Major Accident Hazards (COMAH) Regulations – Regulates the handling of hazardous substances to prevent major accidents.

Why Compliance Matters

Failure to comply with these laws can lead to severe penalties, legal action, and reputational damage. As demonstrated in the ‘In Court’ case studies, businesses that neglect safety regulations risk fines, operational disruptions, and, most importantly, harm to their workers.

How Compass HSC Can Help

Health and safety professionals, like those at Compass HSC, are here to make sense of these regulations and ensure your business stays compliant. Whether it’s conducting risk assessments, delivering training, or providing expert advice, we help you navigate the complexities of workplace safety laws.

📢Do you understand which regulations apply to your business? Contact Compass HSC today for expert guidance and compliance support.

The post Understanding UK Health and Safety Regulations and Acts first appeared on Compass HSC.

]]>
https://compasshsc.co.uk/understanding-uk-health-and-safety-regulations-and-acts/feed/ 0
Wood Dust: The Silent Killer in the Workplace https://compasshsc.co.uk/wood-dust-the-silent-killer-in-the-workplace/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=wood-dust-the-silent-killer-in-the-workplace https://compasshsc.co.uk/wood-dust-the-silent-killer-in-the-workplace/#respond Wed, 12 Mar 2025 11:00:00 +0000 https://compasshsc.co.uk/?p=13645

Wood is an everyday material, used widely in construction, manufacturing, and woodworking. Yet, many workers handle it with little awareness of the long-term health risks associated with wood dust exposure.

Why Wood Dust is a Serious Health Hazard

Regular activities like sawing, sanding, and planing produce fine dust particles that, when inhaled, can lead to severe health conditions, including:
🔴 Occupational asthma
🔴 Chronic bronchitis
🔴 Nasal cancer

Despite these risks, many workers remain unaware or dismissive of the dangers. Until wood dust is treated with the same caution as asbestos, workers will continue to face avoidable health complications.

Workplace Exposure Limits (WELs)

To control exposure, the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) has set legal Workplace Exposure Limits (WELs) for wood dust over an 8-hour period:
Softwood – 5mg/m³
Hardwood – 3mg/m³

How to Protect Yourself and Your Workforce

To reduce exposure and comply with regulations:
Use dust extraction systems – Attach dust bags and collectors to tools where possible.
Vacuum at the source – Use industrial vacuums (not compressed air) to collect dust before it spreads.
Wear proper respiratory protection – FFP3 respirators should be face-fit tested for a secure seal.
Never dry sweep – Always dampen down dust before cleaning and wear a mask.

Conclusion

Wood dust exposure may not cause immediate harm, but the long-term effects can be life-threatening. Employers and workers alike must take proactive steps to control exposure and protect their health.

📢 Need guidance on workplace dust control? Contact Compass HSC today for expert advice on compliance and best practices.

The post Wood Dust: The Silent Killer in the Workplace first appeared on Compass HSC.

]]>
https://compasshsc.co.uk/wood-dust-the-silent-killer-in-the-workplace/feed/ 0
Preventing Workplace Tragedies: A Call to Action https://compasshsc.co.uk/preventing-workplace-tragedies-a-call-to-action/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=preventing-workplace-tragedies-a-call-to-action https://compasshsc.co.uk/preventing-workplace-tragedies-a-call-to-action/#respond Tue, 19 Mar 2024 09:00:00 +0000 http://old.compasshsc.co.uk/?p=11486 In this blog post, we delve into a recent incident where a major pizza maker faced significant fines after two workers suffered severe injuries. Discover why prioritising safety is paramount, how to prevent similar tragedies, and how Compass HSC can help businesses create safer work environments. Act before an accident occurs—prioritise safety today!

The post Preventing Workplace Tragedies: A Call to Action first appeared on Compass HSC.

]]>
Compass HSC - Our Logo

Preventing Workplace Tragedies: A Call to Action

At Compass HSC, our mission is clear: to ensure the safety and well-being of every individual in the workplace. Today, we address a sobering incident that serves as a stark reminder of the critical importance of prioritising safety at all times.

What Happened

Recently, a major pizza maker faced an £800,000 fine after two workers suffered severe injuries in machinery-related incidents. These unfortunate and preventable events, which occurred at the company’s factory in Bolton, shed light on the devastating consequences of inadequate safety measures.

In one instance, a worker had his arm drawn into an inadequately guarded conveyor belt, resulting in muscle loss and the need for a skin graft. In another tragic incident, a father of two had part of his finger severed after his hand became trapped between a roller and a conveyor belt.

Why It Happened

The investigation revealed alarming lapses in safety protocols. Machinery was not adequately guarded, and checks to ensure the effectiveness of protective measures were lacking. Additionally, disabling of guarding systems and access to dangerous machine parts were allowed, contributing to the tragic outcomes.

How to Prevent

It’s imperative for businesses to prioritise safety measures to prevent such incidents. Proper guarding of machinery, regular checks to ensure effectiveness of safety measures, and strict adherence to safety protocols are essential. Creating a culture of safety, where every individual is empowered to identify and report hazards, is crucial for preventing accidents.

How We Help

At Compass HSC, we stand alongside businesses in their commitment to safety. Our team of experts works tirelessly to assist companies in implementing robust safety protocols tailored to their specific needs.

From conducting thorough risk assessments to providing comprehensive safety training, we equip businesses with the tools and knowledge to create a safer work environment.

If you have concerns about your equipment or processes, our experienced team is ready to provide tailored solutions, ensuring a secure and compliant working environment for your business.

Act Before an Accident, Not After!

The time to prioritise safety is now. Let’s not wait for tragedy to strike before taking action. By proactively addressing safety concerns and implementing preventive measures, we can protect lives and prevent accidents. Together, let’s make safety a top priority in every workplace.

At Compass HSC, we’re here to support you every step of the way on your journey to a safer workplace. Contact us today to learn more about how we can help you prioritise safety and prevent accidents before they occur.

Remember, safety is not just a priority—it’s a responsibility. Let’s work together to make safety a reality for every worker, every day.

Don’t wait for a legal wake-up call, contact us today.

For proactive safety solutions, contact us or call us at (01253) 735755.

Follow us on LinkedIn | Follow Brian Lambert on LinkedIn | Follow us on Twitter | Like us on Facebook

The post Preventing Workplace Tragedies: A Call to Action first appeared on Compass HSC.

]]>
https://compasshsc.co.uk/preventing-workplace-tragedies-a-call-to-action/feed/ 0